Picture a man sitting by the edge of a still pond, admiring the calm, serene, reflective quality of the water; truly relishing in its apparent qualities.
Now, let’s suppose every now and then a boat cruises by some 50 yards away from the shore, causing waves to appear, rushing toward the man and disturbing the stillness of the water. The man gets upset at the sight of the waves, so he jumps into the water and attempts to stop the waves using his hands. He tries pushing them down and breaking them apart. He even tries to hold them back so they don’t reach the shore. After a while he will see that the waves are not longer coming in, and he finishes his wave-stopping process until he feels the water is calm enough go back to sitting on the shore.
And then a storm comes. The howling wind disturbs the water, and rain drops splash through the surface. Again, the man jumps in, doing his best to shield the water from falling drops, and still the wind-blown surface. Eventually, the storm recedes. He finishes his work, and goes back to the edge of the shore, exhausted.
And then…
The man in this story fails to realize three very simple, yet important, things: First, that there’s nothing he can do to prevent the water from become disturbed on occasion. There are forces beyond his control, which do not under any circumstances surrender to his desire or will. Second, the act of jumping into the water and manipulating it only exacerbates the initial disturbance. Not only are there waves, but now there’s a man frantically thrashing about, bringing about even more chaos. And third, the water is of the nature to self-stabilize once the disturbance has passed. It didn’t become still because the man jumped in and made it so. Rather, it became still after it was allowed settle according to its own nature.
The man’s attachment to stillness may be the root of the problem. But, even if he remains attached to stillness, he is better off to not interfere with the water when it becomes disturbed. For, then he is likely to experience more stillness than would otherwise be the case. He could do nothing about his attachment and merely behave differently, and his attachment would be better fulfilled.
But, how much better would it be if the man no longer cared whether or not the water was still or disturbed? What if he could learn to appreciate the various ways that water behaves under the various changing circumstances of life, that remain utterly beyond his control? Why, he wouldn’t even need to speed all of his time tending to the shore. He could come and go as he pleases.
Now, that’s dharma!

5 comments
Comments feed for this article
December 15, 2011 at 1:23 pm
suki
Enjoying your blog Sam. Find it interesting and informative and of course very insightful. You have a way with words that I can relate and resonate with. It is what’s behind the words I sense which is more important. Your dialogue and exchanges with your commenters are very fruitful and the way you engage. A good sprinkling of equanimity goes along way.
I have no questions at this time for you, but should something come up, I know where you are.
Cheers – Suki
December 15, 2011 at 1:28 pm
Sam Watts
Thank you, Suki. Stop by anytime.
December 16, 2011 at 8:03 am
Sindder Streg
You helped me untie a knot when I read this yesterday. Sincerely: thanks.
Side note: the man no longer caring seems to be a heart or stomach kind of thing. Score one for emotions!!
December 16, 2011 at 8:43 am
Sam Watts
Ah, yes – the heart and guts. The uneasiness of not trusting the water to look after itself tends to show up in one or the other, or both. The heart may be afraid of being exposed, of allowing touch. But it’s happiest when open. The guts may be afraid to disappear, to fall into nothingness, never to return. But it finds contentment when grounded in groundlessness.
Glad I could help, SS.
December 17, 2011 at 1:26 pm
Monkey Mind
I had a lot of fun playing with this one. Some samples:
Is the man really sitting on the shore, entering the water only occasionally, or is he in the water all the time? Is he aware of the shore? Is there even a shore? What about the people (some non-swimmers) standing in there up to their necks? Are there any headlands or protected bays where bathing is safer? Which direction is that, away from the shore?
Really nice. Thanks for thiis!
Cheers,
Florian