Vipassana, or “Insight” meditation is one of the more popular practices that may actually lead to awakening. Originating in the conservative Theravada Buddhist tradition, vipassana is way of paying attention to the phenomena appearing in one’s awareness in such a way as to notice aspects of the sensate world that are almost always overlooked. These universal aspects of phenomenal appearances are called the Three Characteristics. The Three Characteristics are impermanence (Pali: anicca), nonself (anatta), and suffering (dukkha). By noticing that phenomenal appearances are marked by these characteristics, one succeeds in eventually loosening their identification with them. Since the early Buddhist literature is all about achieving liberation, this dis-identification process is how it is supposed to be done.
The principle act of the vipassana meditator is noting (or noticing). One sits in meditation and notices how nothing lasts, how everything changes, how it all happens on its own, and how no phenomenal appearance is truly satisfying – vipassana in a nutshell. However, there was an innovation by the contemporary meditation teacher Shinzen Young, which I think makes this practice all the more valuable to anyone with awakening as their sole aim.
Looking back at the previous techniques in the Practice Profiles series, there’s an obvious common thread. The inevitable conclusion of both self-enquiry and tracing back the radiance is the same: the recognition of the source. These might be referred to as direct path teachings, whereas vipassana might be referred to as a gradual path due to its goal of eventual liberation via dis-identification. But vipassana practice may also be used as a means of recognizing the source. Here’s how…
When one first begins vipassana practice, their concentration probably isn’t all that high (unless they’ve spent considerable time working on concentration prior to starting vipassana practice). So their first aim is to begin recognizing the phenomena that they generally confuse to be their self. Shinzen Young breaks it down into three classifications of phenomena – feel, image, talk. By observing the transient nature of feel, image, and talk, one can come to recognize the “emptiness of self,” and thus experience a great measure of freedom.
As one’s concentration deepens, their perception gets more refined, and the phenomena that used to be easily classified into feel, image, and talk begin to be experienced as very subtle vibrations. One realizes not only the “emptiness of self,” but also that all phenomena is “empty of inherent existence.” There are no universal phenomenal appearances – no ultimate “dharmas” that come and go in-and-out of experience. In other words, the philosopher Heraclitus was right when he said that, “all is flux.” With nothing to grasp, we let go even deeper and experience even more freedom.
Now, here’s where the gradual and direct paths converge. If one pays attention to the subtle vibrations, they may notice exactly when and where the arise and vanish. If one is able to note the vanishings, they may be able to recognize the source – as the source is that from which things arise, and to which they return. It is the very same source which is left when the “I am” collapses due to self-enquiry practice. And, it is the very same source which may be recognized by tracing back the radiance. When recognition occurs, one may let go and rest effortlessly as the source. And that, my friends, is good practice.
Many hardcore vipassana types will notice that I left many details out of this post – very important details for the diehard types. I mentioned nothing about the progress of insight, or the Visuddhimagga, or the four paths of enlightenment, or bhanga (dissolution), etc. I’ve only outlined what I find important about vipassana in terms of awakening to the source. For me, nearly everything else is a distraction.
If you want to wake up, vipassana can get you there. Just don’t get caught in any dogmatic traps (like all of the fanatical SN Goenka followers), and try not to be too heady about it. If you’re an intellectual type, forget about the Three Characteristics and save yourself some time. Give your energy to noticing rather than thinking, and you’ll have a lot more success with the practice.
Sam

2 comments
Comments feed for this article
June 24, 2010 at 1:27 am
Monkey Mind
Nice article. Heraclitus left many good one-liners.
While I agree that the different practices converge, knowing the source in all the sensations “out there” doing their causal thing really is a different flavor from knowing it by turning attention towards it, tracing back to the “place in there” where perception is.
At least, to me, the two seem to imply opposites, not unlike the opposites of “true self” and “not self”.
But then, most of this awakening stuff presents paradoxically.
One neat thing to do / give one’s energy to, is to notice the tape-loops of verbal thought when they happen. Takes a bit of practice to be able to do this consistently, but it’s definitely worth the effort.
Cheers,
Florian
June 24, 2010 at 7:18 am
Sam Watts
In my experience, recognizing the source by tracing it back is a preliminary to recognizing the non-dual relationship of conditioned and unconditioned (form and emptiness). It’s not enough just to look to the conditioned and try to see that it’s nothing other than the source. One’s beam of attention must turn toward the source before it can really be known, and only then does one really taste the fact that all is none other than the source. Paradoxical indeed.
I agree that noticing the tape-loops of verbal thought – what Shinzen Young would refer to as “talk” – is a valuable activity. Taking the volitional energy out of the thinking process, and then seeing how it spins and sputters around on its own, is an important insight.